12/29/2023
The Fire: Accountability, Remembrance, and Erasure
Part 4/6
After the 2018 fire, inspectors found code violations that numbered in the hundreds. The media came. Elected officials came. The fire made national news.
What followed could not be covered up or wished away. A month before, a freak tornado downed power lines and wrecked houses on Greensboro’s historically Black East Side. Strong Black leadership and response led by so many residents and organizers meant that accountability measures would be in place and help would follow. Although the neighborhood around the Summit-Cone apartments wasn’t affected, it was part of East Side. A District 2 community town hall meeting attracted Black faces from the Summit-Cone apartments and long time residents because top agenda items were the fire and tornado. Meetings led by the City’s International Advisory Committee (IAC) brought in elected officials and housing and fire department officials. Other meetings would occur that revealed in the presence of elected officials the sharp differences between resettlement agencies and the refugee families they served, at long last alerting city council members of their responsibilities to refugees as city residents, not charity cases. Clear voices from refugee families spoke out that did not need and did not welcome intermediaries speaking for them. The mayor, city council members, city officials and agencies charged with their welfare heard from speakers who spoke in clear English that Summit-Cone resembled a refugee camp, that discrimination prevailed, that to work with one resettlement agency was to put one’s life at risk. And finally, from the father of the dead children came the pointed rhetorical question to the room’s leadership about whether there was any coordination in this system of seeming non-accountability. Such frank assessments caused an indignant uproar from one agency representative but clearly, refugees’ words were heard and could not be silenced. The single thoughtful response I recall from that meeting came from a former resettlement agency director who regretted actions under her watch that might have contributed to the children’s deaths. What happened that day was a significant change in the relationship between the City of Greensboro and all of its refugee communities. No longer could the City rely on refugee resettlement agencies and their long time supporters to be the prime representatives, consultants, and representatives of refugees and their interests. The deaths of children, the solid work by the small team of IAC members elected from refugee and immigrant communities, and the undeniable voices of community leaders who lived through the fire were the price newcomers paid in order to be heard by our political establishment. When yet another refugee family living in a house owned by the same Summit-Cone landlord almost suffered the same fiery end, this time the mayor showed up in a hurry.
In 2019, with the approaching anniversary of the fire I asked Jeremy and Daniel, two highly regarded peace mediators, if they would host a series of three meetings for anyone interested in participating in a reflective discourse about what had happened at Summit-Cone. The meetings would be freighted with emotion because so little frank talk had taken place with those battling to minimize the tragedy. At the first meeting I certainly didn’t expect the owners to show up. They were facing serious charges brought by city lawyers about payment of large housing violation fines. But I did believe that if given the chance that others such as City officials and resettlement agency leaders might come, speak, listen, and perhaps be prepared to compromise. I thought that the thirty or so families forced to move after the city finally found the political will to do what it could not do in 2013, close the entire complex, were owed a factual account of what happened. I thought of the future when the children who played with those who died grew up and wondered what happened, because I did not believe that the gofundme donation given to the parents would be a sufficient answer. I considered what effect it might have on both children and their parents to walk past the burned out apartment for four months while they searched for new places to live. To remind participants, the mediators taped the names of each child to an empty chair. “The weight of this sad time we must obey, Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say” were the words Shakespeare used to conclude one of his most disturbing plays, King Lear. But the three sessions we held yielded little talk about accountability. There were words about love and care, as I recall, “kumbaya talk” as James described afterward, but not about stepping up or accepting moral responsibility when failure on every level was so obvious.
Politically, I saw progress with City leadership. But would these agencies, contractors entrusted by the state’s Department of Health and Human Service to ensure the safety of refugee families, change their ways? Our three peace circle meetings did not result in a “clearing of the air”, clarification by NC DHHS of its oversight of resettlement contractors operating in Greensboro, acknowledgement by those agencies of community leaders’ preeminent roles, or assurances by the City or state contractors that the placement of vulnerable populations into dangerous housing would cease. Our original purpose in holding these meetings one year after the fire was to give some kind of community response in the absence of any official recognition or remembrance. It took the City thirty years to offer a “statement of regret” concerning its role in the 1979 Greensboro Massacre, and six more years before it placed a marker at the Morningside Homes site.
end Part 4/6
Next: During COVID-19, when one infected individual could spread the disease to hundreds, officials finally realize how important are direct relations with refugee community leaders.